MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/ijo.ijo_3040_23

Медицинская библиотека · Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2025

Evaluation of optical coherence tomography changes in amblyopia.

Goyal Jawahar L, Arora Jigyasa, Gahlot Abha, Singh Divya, Sharma Neharika, Yadav Nisha

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

AIM: To study the Central Macular Thickness (CMT) and Retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness (RNFLT) using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) in cases of amblyopia.

METHODS AND MATERIAL: The study was conducted on 30 patients of unilateral amblyopia having vision of less than 6/12 (30 amblyopic eyes and 30 fellow eyes) and age matched 30 eyes of normal controls aged between 5-30 years. Vision, Refraction and ophthalmological examination was done. OCT changes in macula and RNFL layer were evaluated in both eyes of each patient and controls. The data was statistically analyzed using SPSS version 22.

RESULTS

Out of 30 patients 14 were anisomyopic and 16 were anisohyperopics. The mean central macular thickness among amblyopic eyes was significantly increased (238.77±3.64 µm) a.c.t fellow eyes (218.73±4.71µm). Average retinal nerve fibre layer thickness among amblyopic eyes was significantly increased (100.50±7.70 µm) a.c.t fellow eyes (95.67±6.38) (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The eyes with unilateral anisometropic amblyopia were associated with higher Central Macular Thickness (CMT) and thicker global Retinal Nerve Fibre Layer (RNFL) when compared to normal fellow eyes.

Для цитирования: Goyal Jawahar L, Arora Jigyasa, Gahlot Abha, Singh Divya, Sharma Neharika, Yadav Nisha. Evaluation of optical coherence tomography changes in amblyopia.. Indian journal of ophthalmology. 2025. DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_3040_23.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.