MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08869634.2019.1603795

Медицинская библиотека · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 2019

Relationship between craniocervical posture and skeletal class: A statistical multivariate approach for studying Class II and Class III malocclusions.

Sandoval Camilo, Díaz Alejandro, Manríquez Germán

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Objective

To investigate the relationships between craniocervical posture and skeletal Class in cephalometric radiographs of adult subjects.

Methods

Sixty-five cephalometric radiographs were classified after Delaire, as skeletal Class II and III. The craniocervical posture was evaluated using the variables proposed by Solow (1976) and Rocabado (1983). In order to test the null hypothesis (absence of an association between craniocervical posture and skeletal Class), uni- and multivariate statistical protocols were carried out.

Results

Skeletal Class II presented a more posterior rotation of the ramus in relation to the cranium and a more extended head than skeletal Class III. Additionally, significant correlations were observed in Class II individuals between the rotation of mandibular ramus and cervical lordosis, as well as between rotation of mandibular ramus and craniocervical posture.Discussion: The findings of this research may help to understand the contradictory results described in clinical literature about the effect of skeletal class on craniocervical posture.

Для цитирования: Sandoval Camilo, Díaz Alejandro, Manríquez Germán. Relationship between craniocervical posture and skeletal class: A statistical multivariate approach for studying Class II and Class III malocclusions.. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice. 2019. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.2019.1603795.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.