MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.004

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association · 2019

A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior decompression with fusion and posterior laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.

Yoshii Toshitaka, Egawa Satoru, Hirai Takashi, Kaito Takashi, Mori Kanji, Koda Masao, Chikuda Hirotaka, Hasegawa Tomohiko, Imagama Shiro, Yoshida Masahiro, Iwasaki Motoki, Okawa Atsushi, Kawaguchi Yoshiharu

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The optimal surgical procedure for the treatment of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remains controversial because there are few comprehensive studies investigating the surgical methods. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate evidence in the literature and compare the surgical outcomes of anterior decompression with fusion (ADF) and laminoplasty (LAMP), which are representative procedures for cervical OPLL.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify comparative studies of ADF and LAMP for cervical OPLL. The language was restricted to English, and the year of publication was from January 1980 to December 2018. We extracted outcomes from the studies, such as preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, cervical alignment, surgical complications and reoperation rate. Then, meta-analysis was performed for these surgical outcomes.

RESULTS

Twelve studies were obtained, including 1 prospective cohort study and 11 retrospective cohort studies. In the meta-analysis, neurological recovery rate in JOA score was greater in ADF than in LAMP, especially in patients with a large canal occupying ratio (≥60%) and preoperative kyphotic alignment. ADF also exhibited more favorable results in postoperative cervical alignment. In contrast, operating time and intraoperative blood loss were greater in ADF. Surgical complications were more frequently seen in ADF, leading to higher rates of reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and meta-analysis showed both the merits and shortcomings of ADF and LAMP. ADF resulted in more favorable neurological recovery compared to LAMP, especially for patients with massive OPLL and kyphotic alignment. Postoperative cervical lordosis was also better preserved in ADF. However, ADF was associated with greater surgical invasion and higher incidences of surgical complications.

Для цитирования: Yoshii Toshitaka, Egawa Satoru, Hirai Takashi, Kaito Takashi, Mori Kanji, Koda Masao, Chikuda Hirotaka, Hasegawa Tomohiko, Imagama Shiro, Yoshida Masahiro, Iwasaki Motoki, Okawa Atsushi, Kawaguchi Yoshiharu. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing anterior decompression with fusion and posterior laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament.. Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association. 2019. DOI: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.03.004.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.