MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s001340050959

Медицинская библиотека · Intensive care medicine · 1999

Cervical necrotizing fasciitis: 10 years' experience at a single institution.

Mohammedi I, Ceruse P, Duperret S, Vedrinne J, Boulétreau P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate clinical and microbiologic characteristics, modalities of treatment and outcome of patients with cervical necrotizing fasciitis admitted to our institution.

DESIGN

Retrospective clinical investigation.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

We reviewed the charts of 20 consecutive patients hospitalized in our Intensive Care Unit between January 1987 and June 1998 with the diagnosis of cervical necrotizing fasciitis.

RESULTS

All the patients required mechanical ventilation. Four of them had mediastinal involvement. The organisms most commonly implicated included Streptococcus, Prevotella, and Peptostreptococcus species. Patients with adequate surgery had a better outcome than those with inadequate surgical procedures. Because no evidence-based recommendations exist in the field of head and neck infections, hyperbaric oxygen was not used as adjunctive therapy. Of the 20 patients, 3 (15 %) died.

CONCLUSION

The main finding of this study is that prompt, rather than delayed, surgical débridement correlates with a decrease in morbidity and mortality. However, no definite conclusion is justified due to the relatively small number of patients. Immediate radical débridement, and early redébridement if needed, appropriate antibiotics and intensive care support are critical in controlling these life-threatening infections.

Для цитирования: Mohammedi I, Ceruse P, Duperret S, Vedrinne J, Boulétreau P. Cervical necrotizing fasciitis: 10 years' experience at a single institution.. Intensive care medicine. 1999. DOI: 10.1007/s001340050959.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.