MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s11999-010-1603-2

Медицинская библиотека · Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2011

Is intraoperative CT of posterior cervical spine instrumentation cost-effective and does it reduce complications?

Hecht Andrew C, Koehler Steven M, Laudone Janelle C, Jenkins Arthur, Qureshi Sheeraz

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Symptomatic multilevel cervical myelopathy is often addressed using posterior decompression using two-dimensional fluoroscopy. Intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy provides more accurate information on the position of instrumentation to prevent screw-related complications.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We documented the incidence of hardware-related complications and evaluate cost-effectiveness when using intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy (ISO-C CT) in posterior cervical spine surgery.

METHODS

Records from 87 patients who underwent posterior cervical decompression and instrumented fusion for multilevel cervical spondylosis with myelopathy were retrospectively reviewed. Patients in whom a lateral mass, pars, or pedicle screw was removed or revised based on intraoperative ISO-C CT was recorded. Cost analysis was performed using 2008 Medicare reimbursements and was compared against cost estimates for ISO-C CT.

RESULTS

Seven patients (8%) had screws changed based on the results of the three-dimensional fluoroscopy: 0.5% of lateral mass screws, 3.1% of thoracic pedicle screws, and 15% of C2 pars screws. No patients who had evaluation of hardware with the ISO-C CT required a return to surgery for complications secondary to hardware failure, malposition, or cutout.

CONCLUSIONS

Cost savings are achieved if use of intraoperative ISO-C CT prevents eight patients from requiring a return to the operating room. If every malpositioned screw has the potential to be symptomatic, then 240 patients must have screws placed to be cost-effective. ISO-C CT can safely replace postoperative CT as the standard of care in patients undergoing posterior cervical spinal fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, economic and decision analyses. See Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Для цитирования: Hecht Andrew C, Koehler Steven M, Laudone Janelle C, Jenkins Arthur, Qureshi Sheeraz. Is intraoperative CT of posterior cervical spine instrumentation cost-effective and does it reduce complications?. Clinical orthopaedics and related research. 2011. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1603-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.