MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90147-1

Медицинская библиотека · Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 1996

Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 2. Discogenic low back pain.

Scheer S J, Radack K L, O'Brien D R

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The purpose of this review was to determine the efficacy of treatments for discogenic low back pain (LBP) by examining all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of discogenic LBP published in the English language literature between 1975 and 1993 with "return to work" (RTW) as the end point. From more than 4,000 LBP citations, nearly 600 articles were initially reviewed; 35 studies met our selection criteria. Twenty-two studies were discussed in Part 1 (Acute Interventions) or will be discussed in Part 3 (Chronic Interventions). In this review, of 13 RCTs assessing interventions for LBP with sciatica, 9 were appropriate for their focus on, and radiologic confirmation of, discogenic LBP. The treatments assessed included chemonucleolysis, surgical discectomy, and epidural steroid injection. A 26-point system to assess the quality of methodologic rigor was used for each article. Our literature survey found a need for additional studies comparing surgery, conservative care, epidural steroids, traction, and other approaches to determine their individual effects for RTW after discogenic disease.

Для цитирования: Scheer S J, Radack K L, O'Brien D R. Randomized controlled trials in industrial low back pain relating to return to work. Part 2. Discogenic low back pain.. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 1996. DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90147-1.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.