MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1097/bot.0b013e31828fc084

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of orthopaedic trauma · 2013

Antegrade nailing can prevent cubitus varus and valgus after pediatric supracondylar fractures with impacted columns.

Singer Georg, Kraus Tanja, Ruttenstock Elke M, Ferlic Peter, Eberl Robert

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Supracondylar fractures are commonly encountered in the pediatric population. An impacted radial or ulnar column may result in the deviation of the elbow axis in the frontal plane clinically seen as cubitus varus or valgus. Antegrade nailing has become a feasible alternative to treat supracondylar fractures. It is not known whether it can prevent the development of cubitus varus or valgus in the cases of fractures with impacted columns. Between 1994 and 2009, 264 supracondylar humeral fractures were treated. Nineteen patients presented with either an impacted ulnar (n = 12) or radial (n = 7) column and were included in the study. The average elbow angle in fractures with impacted radial column was 159° mean (range 153-167°) compared with 179° (range 173-184°) in fractures with an impacted ulnar column. After closed reduction and antegrade nailing, the elbow angle was restored to normal values. At follow-up examination after a mean of 3.8 years (range 2.4-7.6 years), no further changes of the humeral-ulnar angle were seen. We are able to show that antegrade nailing is a safe method to treat supracondylar humeral fractures with impacted columns.

Для цитирования: Singer Georg, Kraus Tanja, Ruttenstock Elke M, Ferlic Peter, Eberl Robert. Antegrade nailing can prevent cubitus varus and valgus after pediatric supracondylar fractures with impacted columns.. Journal of orthopaedic trauma. 2013. DOI: 10.1097/bot.0b013e31828fc084.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.