Benefits of using the ultrasonic BoneScalpel™ in temporomandibular joint reconstruction.

PURPOSE: The main objective of this retrospective study is to analyze and report on our operative experiences and outcomes using the ultrasonic BoneScalpel™ (BoneScalpel) versus a conventional reciprocating saw (RecipSaw) for the purpose of completing the osteotomies in total temporomandibular joint reconstruction (TJR) surgery.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

23 consecutive patients presented with a diagnosis of either degenerative joint disease (n = 23), a failing autogenous TJR (n = 1), heterotrophic bone formation (n = 1) or a subcondylar fracture (n = 1) for a total of 26 joints that received a TJR. 13 unique TJR surgeries employed the use of the BoneScalpel to perform the osteotomies and 13 used the RecipSaw.

RESULTS

There was a 49% reduction in the average volume of blood loss in the BoneScalpel group compared to the RecipSaw group (130cc vs. 268cc, p ≤ 0.004), unpaired t-test). For the other variables it was observed that there were more favorable clinical results using the BoneScalpel but without statistically significant differences given the small sample size relative to the prevalence of the outcome that was being measured.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of the BoneScalpel in TMJ reconstruction is overall safer and results in less blood loss compared to surgeries employing the use of the conventional RecipSaw for completing osteotomies.