MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.2217/pmt-2021-0037

Медицинская библиотека · Pain management · 2021

A systematic review of full endoscopic versus micro-endoscopic or open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.

Aiyer Rohit, Noori Selaiman, Schirripa Frank, Schirripa Michael, Jain Sameer, Aboud Talal, Mehta Neel, Elowitz Eric, Pahuta Markian, Datta Sukdeb

СтатьяСистематический обзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Aim: Endoscopic discectomies provide several advantages over other techniques such as traditional open lumbar discectomy (OLD) including possibly decreased complications, shorter hospital stay and an earlier return to work.

Methods

An electronic database search including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Controlled trials (CENTRAL) were reviewed for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only.

Results

A total of nine RCTs met inclusion criteria. Three showed benefit of endoscopic discectomy over the comparator with regards to pain relief, with the remaining six studies showing no difference in pain relief or function.

Conclusion

Based on review of the nine included studies, we can conclude that endoscopic discectomy is as effective as other surgical techniques, and has additional benefits of lower complication rate and superior perioperative parameters.

Для цитирования: Aiyer Rohit, Noori Selaiman, Schirripa Frank, Schirripa Michael, Jain Sameer, Aboud Talal, Mehta Neel, Elowitz Eric, Pahuta Markian, Datta Sukdeb. A systematic review of full endoscopic versus micro-endoscopic or open discectomy for lumbar disc herniation.. Pain management. 2021. DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2021-0037.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.