MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/08869634.1999.11746083

Медицинская библиотека · Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice · 1999

Reconsideration of the TMJ condylar position during internal derangement: comparison between condylar position on tomogram and degree of disk displacement on MRI.

Ozawa S, Boering G, Kawata T, Tanimoto K, Tanne K

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

The objective of this study was to investigate condylar position during different degrees of disk displacement. The degree of disk displacement was evaluated on 1.5 Tesla high-field sagittal MR images of 76 joints (48 patients; mean age 19.4 years) and was classified into three grades (1 to 3). To establish condylar position, the anterior, superior and posterior joint spaces were measured on corrected tomograms. The possible relationship between condylar position, indicated by the width of joint space and successive degree of disk displacement, was compared by a one-way factorial ANOVA (p < 0.05). The anterior joint space was significantly larger in grades 1, 2, and 3 disk displacements than in grade 0 pointing to a dorsal condylar position. The posterior joint space was significantly smaller in grades 1 and 2 compared with grade 0. When the degree of the disk displacement becomes severe (i.e., grade 3 disk displacement), the posterior joint space tends to increase to a similar distance as in a normal healthy joint pointing to a more normal condylar position.

Для цитирования: Ozawa S, Boering G, Kawata T, Tanimoto K, Tanne K. Reconsideration of the TMJ condylar position during internal derangement: comparison between condylar position on tomogram and degree of disk displacement on MRI.. Cranio : the journal of craniomandibular practice. 1999. DOI: 10.1080/08869634.1999.11746083.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.