Gotfried percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) versus dynamic hip screw (DHS) in hip fractures: blood loss and 1-year mortality.

BACKGROUND

Intertrochanteric fractures are among the most common fracture in elderly and are correlated with an average 1-year mortality of 25 %. Increased mortality after hip fracture could be related to blood loss and comorbidities.

AIMS: We compared two groups of patients treated with percutaneous compression plating (PCCP) and dynamic hip screw (DHS) with the hypothesis that treatment with PCCP can reduce blood loss and 1-year mortality. We furthermore investigated the role of several surgical-related and patient-related factors on mortality of all the enrolled patients.

METHODS

We performed a comparative retrospective study of 280 patients with type 31A1 or 31A2 hip fractures treated in our department from January 2004 to May 2008. Exclusion criteria were age <60 years, multiple injuries and pathological fractures. A total of 194 patients were treated with DHS, and 86 patients were treated with PCCP.

RESULTS

No statistical differences were found in term of blood loss, blood transfusion and 1-year mortality between the two groups, whereas we found a significant incidence of gender, age, American Society of Anaesthesiologists score and preoperative haemoglobin on mortality.

DISCUSSION: Both plates seem to be comparable in terms of blood loss and blood transfusion rate, and mortality was rather correlated with some patient-related factors reflecting the global health status.

CONCLUSION

Emerging mortality in this kind of patient should encourage us to improve preventative orthogeriatric health care.