Sleep health · 2025
Performance evaluation of a machine learning-based methodology using dynamical features to detect nonwear intervals in actigraphy data in a free-living setting.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Das Jyotirmoy Nirupam, Ji Linying, Shen Yuqi, Kumara Soundar, Buxton Orfeu M, Chow Sy-Miin
Аннотация
GOAL AND AIMS: One challenge using wearable sensors is nonwear time. Without a nonwear (e.g., capacitive) sensor, actigraphy data quality can be biased by subjective determinations confounding sleep/wake classification. We developed and evaluated a machine learning algorithm supplemented by dynamic features to discern wear/nonwear episodes.
FOCUS TECHNOLOGY: Actigraphy data from wrist actigraph (Spectrum, Philips-Respironics).
REFERENCE TECHNOLOGY: The built-in nonwear sensor as "ground truth" to classify nonwear periods using other data, mimicking features of Actiwatch 2.
SAMPLE: Data were collected over 1week from employed adults (n = 853).
DESIGN: Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), a tree-based classifier algorithm, was used to classify wear/nonwear, supplemented by dynamic features calculated over various time windows.
CORE ANALYTICS: The performance of the proposed algorithm was tested over 30-second epochs. Additional analytics and exploratory analyses: Evaluation of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to find the effectiveness of the dynamic features.
CORE OUTCOMES: The XGBoost classifier yielded substantial improvements in balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, including dynamic features and comparison to default actiwatch classification algorithms.
IMPORTANT SUPPLEMENTAL OUTCOMES: The proposed classifier effectively distinguished between valid and invalid days, and the duration of contiguous periods of nonwear correctly identified.
CORE CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the potential of XGBoost using dynamic features of varying activity levels across the time series to provide insights on wear/nonwear classification using a large dataset. The methodology provides an alternative to laborious manual benchmarking of the data for similar devices that do not have a nonwear sensor.
FOCUS TECHNOLOGY: Actigraphy data from wrist actigraph (Spectrum, Philips-Respironics).
REFERENCE TECHNOLOGY: The built-in nonwear sensor as "ground truth" to classify nonwear periods using other data, mimicking features of Actiwatch 2.
SAMPLE: Data were collected over 1week from employed adults (n = 853).
DESIGN: Extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), a tree-based classifier algorithm, was used to classify wear/nonwear, supplemented by dynamic features calculated over various time windows.
CORE ANALYTICS: The performance of the proposed algorithm was tested over 30-second epochs. Additional analytics and exploratory analyses: Evaluation of the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) values to find the effectiveness of the dynamic features.
CORE OUTCOMES: The XGBoost classifier yielded substantial improvements in balanced accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, including dynamic features and comparison to default actiwatch classification algorithms.
IMPORTANT SUPPLEMENTAL OUTCOMES: The proposed classifier effectively distinguished between valid and invalid days, and the duration of contiguous periods of nonwear correctly identified.
CORE CONCLUSION: Our findings highlight the potential of XGBoost using dynamic features of varying activity levels across the time series to provide insights on wear/nonwear classification using a large dataset. The methodology provides an alternative to laborious manual benchmarking of the data for similar devices that do not have a nonwear sensor.