MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.21873/anticanres.14782

Медицинская библиотека · Anticancer research · 2021

Pooled-analysis of Lipegfilgrastim Effectiveness and Safety Among Patients With Blood Malignancies in the Real-world Setting.

Pettengell Ruth, Wolff Thomas, Goehler Thomas, Cascavilla Nicola

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/AIM: The aim of this report was to summarize the real-world experience with lipegfilgrastim as a neutropenia prophylaxis in a large cohort of lymphoma patients receiving immuno-, chemo-therapy.

PATIENTS AND

METHODS

Observational clinical data were derived from two phase IV studies (NADIR and LEOS) with similar protocols conducted in eight European countries for 677 patients.

RESULTS

Categories for risk of febrile neutropenia were predominantly high (54.5%) or intermediate (38.8%). The most frequent patient-associated risk factors were age >65 years (54.4%), female sex (43.9%), hemoglobin <12 g/dL (25.3%), and prior febrile neutropenia (14.5%). The incidence of febrile neutropenia and Grade 3/4 neutropenia was 5.9% and 14.6%, respectively over all cycles of immuno-, chemo-therapy (n=3018). Adverse drug reactions occurred in 74 patients (10.9%), with bone pain (2.2%), myalgia (1.8%), and pyrexia (1.0%) occurring in ≥1% of patients.

CONCLUSION

Lipegfilgrastim prophylaxis against chemotherapy-induced neutropenia was effective and well tolerated in lymphoma patients in real-world clinical practice.

Для цитирования: Pettengell Ruth, Wolff Thomas, Goehler Thomas, Cascavilla Nicola. Pooled-analysis of Lipegfilgrastim Effectiveness and Safety Among Patients With Blood Malignancies in the Real-world Setting.. Anticancer research. 2021. DOI: 10.21873/anticanres.14782.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.