MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1367

Медицинская библиотека · The journal of contemporary dental practice · 2013

Assessment of 2D:4D in subjects with anteroposterior mandibular dysplasia.

Premkumar Sridhar, Gurumurthy Bhuvaneswari

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To compare 2D:4D ratio which is determined by testosterone levels with patients having orthognathic, retrognathic and prognathic mandibles.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

The study was performed at Chennai, on 320 subjects of which, 60 subjects (32 males and 28 females) had retrognathic mandible; 55 subjects (25 males and 30 females) had prognathic mandible and 205 subjects (98 males and 107 females) had normal mandible. All the subjects had a normal maxilla and were in the age group of 18 to 25 years. 2D:4D ratio was determined using the photocopies of the ventral surface of right hand made with vernier calipers of 0.01 mm accuracy. Statistical analysis was undertaken using Student's t- test, ANOVA test and TukeyHSD test.

RESULTS

(i) Low 2D:4D is seen in subjects with mandibular prognathism, (ii) Among females, low 2D:4D is seen only in prognathic mandible.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight the fact that testosterone plays an important role in mandibular growth. Thus 2D:4D, a least invasive and reproducible procedure can be used as an early marker for mandibular progathism, and as a diagnostic tool in correlating the mandibular growth with causal relations between hormones and craniofacial development.

Для цитирования: Premkumar Sridhar, Gurumurthy Bhuvaneswari. Assessment of 2D:4D in subjects with anteroposterior mandibular dysplasia.. The journal of contemporary dental practice. 2013. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1367.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.