MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/03635465211029642

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of sports medicine · 2021

Surgical Management of Focal Chondral Defects of the Talus: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.

Migliorini Filippo, Maffulli Nicola, Schenker Hanno, Eschweiler Jörg, Driessen Arne, Knobe Matthias, Tingart Markus, Baroncini Alice

СтатьяNetwork Meta-AnalysisПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

No consensus has been reached regarding the optimal surgical treatment for focal chondral defects of the talus.

PURPOSE: A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to compare the clinical scores and complications of mosaicplasty, osteochondral auto- and allograft transplant, microfracture, matrix-assisted autologous chondrocyte transplant, and autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects of the talus at midterm follow-up.

STUDY

DESIGN

Bayesian network meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.

METHODS

This Bayesian network meta-analysis followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions. PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were accessed in February 2021. All clinical trials comparing 2 or more surgical interventions for the management of chondral defects of the talus were accessed. The outcomes of interest were visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, rate of failure, and rate of revision surgery. The network meta-analysis were performed through the routine for Bayesian hierarchical random-effects model analysis. The log odds ratio (LOR) effect measure was used for dichotomous variables, and the standardized mean difference (SMD) was used for continuous variables.

RESULTS

Data from 13 articles (521 procedures) were retrieved. The median length of the follow-up was 47.8 months (range, 31.7-66.8 months). Analysis of variance revealed no difference between the treatment groups at baseline in terms of age, sex, body mass index, AOFAS score, VAS score, and mean number of defects. AMIC demonstrated the greatest AOFAS score (SMD, 11.27) and lowest VAS score (SMD, -2.26) as well as the lowest rates of failure (LOR, 0.94) and revision (LOR, 0.94). The test for overall inconsistency was not significant.

CONCLUSION

At approximately 4 years of follow-up, the AMIC procedure for management of focal chondral defects of the talus produced the best outcome.

Для цитирования: Migliorini Filippo, Maffulli Nicola, Schenker Hanno, Eschweiler Jörg, Driessen Arne, Knobe Matthias, Tingart Markus, Baroncini Alice. Surgical Management of Focal Chondral Defects of the Talus: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis.. The American journal of sports medicine. 2021. DOI: 10.1177/03635465211029642.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.