Cone-beam CT volumetry: a new method for evaluating osteotomy healing - a clinical evaluation and MDCT comparison.

BACKGROUND

Fracture healing complications remain a major problem in trauma monitoring. An open wedge osteotomy of the distal radius provides a unique way of evaluating fracture healing. Since the introduction of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) at our institution, it has become the method of choice for assessing hand and wrist bones. To date, CT volumetry has been validated for multidetector CT (MDCT) but not for CBCT.

PURPOSE: To assess osteotomy healing using CBCT volumetry and to evaluate two different segmentation techniques.

MATERIAL AND

METHODS

A total of 36 patients were surgically treated for malunited distal radius fractures with open-wedge osteotomy either leaving the void empty (open wedge empty [OWE]) or filled with bone graft substitutes (BGS). They were scanned using CBCT and MDCT postoperatively and after 3, 6, and 12 months. Segmentation was performed both manually and semi-automatically for volumetric measurement. Inter- and intra-observer reliability were assessed using intraclass correlation (ICC).

RESULTS

The median osteotomy volume in the OWE group postoperatively was 0.87 cm3 (range=0.42-2.72). At 3 months, all but one of the OWE volumes had diminished to half or less of their initial volume. In the BGS group, the median postoperative volume was 1.30 cm3 (range=0.73-1.81) and at 12 months, 76% of the initial volume remained. Reliability between CBCT and MDCT volumetry expressed as ICC was ≥0.96. ICC for the two segmentation techniques was ≥0.99 and ICC for inter-observer reliability ≥0.97.

CONCLUSION

CBCT volumetry is a reliable tool and comparable to MDCT to quantify bone healing of an osteotomy.