The American Journal of dermatopathology · 2015
Role of the skin biopsy in the diagnosis of atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Magro Cynthia M, Momtahen Shabnam, Mulvey Joseph Justin, Yassin Aminah H, Kaplan Robert B, Laurence Jeffrey C
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a prototypic thrombotic microangiopathy attributable to complement dysregulation. In the absence of complement inhibition, progressive clinical deterioration occurs. The authors postulated that a biopsy of normal skin could corroborate the diagnosis of aHUS through the demonstration of vascular deposits of C5b-9.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biopsies of normal skin from 22 patients with and without aHUS were processed for routine light microscopy and immunofluorescent studies. An assessment was made for vascular C5b-9 deposition immunohistochemically and by immunofluorescence. The biopsies were obtained primarily from the forearm and/or deltoid.
RESULTS: Patients with classic features of aHUS showed insidious microvascular changes including loose luminal platelet thrombi, except in 2 patients in whom a striking thrombogenic vasculopathy was apparent in biopsied digital ulcers. Extensive microvascular deposits of the membrane attack complex/C5b-9 were identified, excluding 1 patient in whom eculizumab was initiated before biopsy. In 5 of the 7 patients where follow-up was available, the patients exhibited an excellent treatment response to eculizumab. Patients without diagnostic clinical features of aHUS failed to show significant vascular deposits of complement, except 2 patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura including 1 in whom a Factor H mutation was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting where aHUS is an important diagnostic consideration, extensive microvascular deposition of C5b-9 supports the diagnosis of either aHUS or a subset of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura patients with concomitant complement dysregulation; significant vascular C5b-9 deposition predicts clinical responsiveness to eculizumab.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Biopsies of normal skin from 22 patients with and without aHUS were processed for routine light microscopy and immunofluorescent studies. An assessment was made for vascular C5b-9 deposition immunohistochemically and by immunofluorescence. The biopsies were obtained primarily from the forearm and/or deltoid.
RESULTS: Patients with classic features of aHUS showed insidious microvascular changes including loose luminal platelet thrombi, except in 2 patients in whom a striking thrombogenic vasculopathy was apparent in biopsied digital ulcers. Extensive microvascular deposits of the membrane attack complex/C5b-9 were identified, excluding 1 patient in whom eculizumab was initiated before biopsy. In 5 of the 7 patients where follow-up was available, the patients exhibited an excellent treatment response to eculizumab. Patients without diagnostic clinical features of aHUS failed to show significant vascular deposits of complement, except 2 patients with thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura including 1 in whom a Factor H mutation was identified.
CONCLUSIONS: In a clinical setting where aHUS is an important diagnostic consideration, extensive microvascular deposition of C5b-9 supports the diagnosis of either aHUS or a subset of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura patients with concomitant complement dysregulation; significant vascular C5b-9 deposition predicts clinical responsiveness to eculizumab.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdultAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAtypical Hemolytic Uremic SyndromeBiomarkersBiopsyCase-Control StudiesComplement Membrane Attack ComplexFemaleFluorescent Antibody TechniqueHumansImmunohistochemistryImmunosuppressive AgentsMaleMicrovesselsMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsSkinTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult