[Analysis of lysosomal enzyme activity and genetic variants in a child with late-onset Pompe disease].

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical features, lysosomal enzymatic [acid α-glucosidase (GAA)] activities and genetic variants in a child with late-onset Pompe disease (LOPD).

METHODS

Clinical data of a child who had presented at the Genetic Counseling Clinic of West China Second University Hospital in August 2020 was retrospectively analyzed. Blood samples were collected from the patient and her parents for the isolation of leukocytes and lymphocytes as well as DNA extraction. The activity of lysosomal enzyme GAA in leukocytes and lymphocytes was analyzed with or without addition of inhibitor of GAA isozyme. Potential variants in genes associated with neuromuscular disorders were analyzed, in addition with conservation of the variant sites and protein structure. The remaining samples from 20 individuals undergoing peripheral blood lymphocyte chromosomal karyotyping were mixed and used as the normal reference for the enzymatic activities.

RESULTS

The child, a 9-year-old female, had featured delayed language and motor development from 2 years and 11 months. Physical examination revealed unstable walking, difficulty in going upstairs and obvious scoliosis. Her serum creatine kinase was significantly increased, along with abnormal electromyography, whilst no abnormality was found by cardiac ultrasound. Genetic testing revealed that she has harbored compound heterozygous variants of the GAA gene, namely c.1996dupG (p.A666Gfs*71) (maternal) and c.701C>T (p.T234M) (paternal). Based on the guidelines from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics, the c.1996dupG (p.A666Gfs*71) was rated as pathogenic (PVS1+PM2_Supporting+PM3), whilst the c.701C>T (p.T234M) was rated as likely pathogenic (PM1+PM2_Supporting+PM3+PM5+PP3). The GAA in the leukocytes from the patient, her father and mother were respectively 76.1%, 91.3% and 95.6% of the normal value without the inhibitor, and 70.8%, 112.9% and 128.2% of the normal value with the inhibitor, whilst the activity of GAA in their leukocytes had decreased by 6 ~ 9 times after adding the inhibitor. GAA in lymphocytes of the patient, her father and mother were 68.3%, 59.0% and 59.5% of the normal value without the inhibitor, and 41.0%, 89.5% and 57.7% of the normal value with the inhibitor, the activity of GAA in lymphocytes has decreased by 2 ~ 5 times after adding the inhibitor.

CONCLUSION

The child was diagnosed with LOPD due to the c.1996dupG and c.701C>T compound heterozygous variants of the GAA gene. The residual activity of GAA among LOPD patients can range widely and the changes may be atypical. The diagnosis of LOPD should not be based solely on the results of enzymatic activity but combined clinical manifestation, genetic testing and measurement of enzymatic activity.