DOI 10.1097/iae.0000000000004187
GUNN DOTS IN CHILDREN AGED 11-12 YEARS FROM THE GENERAL COMMUNITY SAMPLE COPENHAGEN CHILD COHORT 2000 STUDY.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To study characteristics and associations of Gunn dots in a cohort of healthy children aged 11 to 12 years.
METHODS
As part of the Copenhagen Child Cohort 2000 Study, red-free fundus photographs were taken on 761 healthy children aged 11 to 12 years. The photographs were centered on the optic disk. Gunn dots were annotated and counted within a disk-centered circular grid of 6 mm diameter. Data were analyzed in relation to age, sex, axial length, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness.
RESULTS
Gunn dots were found in 716 of the 761 participants (94%). The majority of dots were located both inferior and superior to the optic disk, situated within a distance of 3 mm from its center. The median number of Gunn dots was 64 (range 0-574) in right eyes and 68 (range 0-532) in left eyes. Having more than the median number of Gunn dots in the right eye was associated with older age (odds ratio 2.12, 95% CI 1.56 to 2.89, P < 0.0001, adjusted for sex, axial length, and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness) and was less common among the children with a thinner retinal nerve fiber layer (odds ratio 0.40, 95% CI 0.26-0.60, P < 0.0001 comparing bottom and top quartiles).
CONCLUSION
Gunn dots were visible in the majority of healthy children aged 11 to 12 years, and large numbers of dots were associated with a thicker nerve fiber layer and with older age, within the limited age range of 1 year. The clinical significance of Gunn dots is unknown. Their location at the vitreoretinal interface makes them a parameter of interest in the study of aging, epiretinal fibrosis, macular pucker and retinal detachment.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.