Detection of Lateral Hinge Fractures After Medial Closing Wedge Distal Femoral Osteotomy: Computed Tomography Versus Plain Radiography.

BACKGROUND

Limited evidence exists in the literature regarding the detection rates of lateral hinge fracture (LHF) on computed tomography (CT) after medial closing wedge distal femoral osteotomy (MCDFO). Moreover, the effect of LHF on bone healing after MCDFO remains unclear.

HYPOTHESIS: The detection rates of LHF after MCDFO would be higher on CT than on plain radiography. The incidence of problematic bone healing would be higher in the knees with LHF than in those without LHF.

STUDY

DESIGN

Cohort study (diagnosis), Level of evidence, 3.

METHODS

Patients who underwent MCDFO between May 2009 and July 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. The presence of LHF was evaluated using immediate postoperative plain radiography and CT. The detection rates of LHF on plain radiography and CT were compared. The incidence of problematic bone healing (nonunion, delayed union, and loss of correction) was also compared between the knees with LHF and those without LHF.

RESULTS

A total of 55 knees of 43 patients (mean age, 37.7 ± 16.7 years) were included in the study. Although 33 LHFs were detected on CT, only 19 LHFs were detected on plain radiography. The detection rate of LHF was significantly higher on CT than on plain radiography (60% vs 34.5%; P = .008). At 1-year follow-up, 10 cases of problematic bone healing (1 nonunion, 4 delayed unions, and 5 losses of correction) were identified. The incidence of problematic bone healing was significantly higher in the knees with LHF than in those without LHF as shown on plain radiography (36.8% vs 8.3%; P = .001) and CT (30.3% vs 0%; P = .004).

CONCLUSION

LHF can be detected better on CT than on plain radiography and has a negative effect on bone healing after MCDFO. For patients with LHF detected on either plain radiography or CT, careful rehabilitation with close follow-up is recommended.