DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109846
Recurrent laryngeal nerve monitoring during thyroidectomy and parathyroidectomy in children.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
Injury of the recurrent laryngeal nerve (RLN) is the most frequent complication of thyroid and parathyroid (TP) surgery. Monitoring of the RLN in children is not widely studied as this is not a common disease in the pediatric population. The aim of our study was to evaluate the reliability, feasibility and benefits of RLN monitoring during TP surgery in children.
METHODS
We analyzed all children who underwent TP surgery in our department between January 2009 and March 2018. Patients were classified into three groups: without monitoring (group 1), monitoring with an endotracheal tube (group 2) and monitoring with a double-needle electrode placed through the cricothyroid ligament (group 3).
RESULTS
We performed 53 surgeries (77 RLNs at risk) on 47 patients aged between 6 months and 18 years. Fourteen RLNs were in group 1, 47 in group 2 and 16 in group 3. We found one transient lesion of the RLN in group 1, three in group 2 and two in group 3. Seven patients in group 3 could not undergo monitoring with the tube because they need an orotracheal tube smaller than the smallest monitoring tube size available. The sensitivity and specificity values of the monitoring methods were 33% and 97% in group 2 and 67% and 100% in group 3, respectively. The positive and negative predictive values were 50% and 95% in group 2 and 100% and 92% in group 3, respectively. No complications arose during insertion of the electrode through the cricothyroid ligament.
CONCLUSION
Monitoring of the RLN with a double-needle electrode inserted through the cricothyroid ligament is a reliable method with no associated complication, which is achievable at any age.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.