DOI 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2025.111327
Exploring the causal relationship between delirium and sarcopenia using bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Population-based studies have validated the significant associations between delirium and sarcopenia. Nonetheless, the causality remains ambiguous. This study aims to elucidate the causal associations between delirium and sarcopenia, as well as the causal effects of medication use on both conditions.
METHODS
A bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis was performed based on public genome-wide association studies (GWAS) data. Causal effects were evaluated through the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method as the principal analysis, supplemented by the weighted median, weighted mode. Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger regression, MR-PRESSO test and leave-one-out were applied for sensitivity analyses.
RESULTS
The IVW method indicated a causal relationship between genetically predicted low hand-grip strength and delirium (OR = 1.31, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.67, P = 0.032). Additionally, diuretics (OR = 1.05, 95 % CI: 1.03-1.07, P < 0.001) and glucocorticoids (OR = 1.06, 95 % CI: 1.01-1.12, P = 0.012) were causally associated with appendicular lean mass, and diabetes medications (OR = 1.04, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.06, P = 0.001) and immunosuppressants (OR = 1.05, 95 % CI: 1.02-1.09, P = 0.005) causally associated with low hand-grip strength. Alternative analytic methods yielded consistent results. Heterogeneity and horizontal pleiotropy were evident in associations between medication use and both delirium and sarcopenia, but the results remained consistent after excluding outliers.
CONCLUSION
This study provided evidence of a causal relationship between genetically predicted low hand-grip strength and delirium. However, the analysis revealed that medication use did not appear to act as a mediating factor between these two conditions. Larger population-based studies are needed to validate these findings.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.