PloS one · 2025
Advance care planning in multiple sclerosis (ConCure-SM): A multicenter single-arm pilot and feasibility study.
СтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеКлиническое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Solari Alessandra, De Panfilis Ludovica, Zagarella Roberta Martina, Ghirotto Luca, Farinotti Mariangela, Gajofatto Alberto, Grasso Maria Grazia, Kruger Paola, Lugaresi Alessandra, Mattarozzi Katia, Montepietra Sara, Patti Francesco, Pucci Eugenio, Rimondini Michela, Solaro Claudio, Perin Marta, Giordano Andrea, Veronese Simone, ConCure-SM project
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Advance care planning (ACP) practice in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (PwPMS) remains limited. ConCure-SM project aims to assess the effectiveness of a structured ACP intervention (clinician's training programme and use of a booklet during ACP conversations) using a multi-phased design.
METHODS: Single-arm pilot/feasibility trial involving PwPMS, their significant others (SOs), and clinicians from six Italian centers. Primary study outcome was completion of an advance care plan document (ACP-Doc). Other outcomes included safety, feasibility of enrollment and assessment, and (analyzed using mixed-methods approach) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), quality of communication, quality of life (MSQOL-29), and caregiver burden. Participants were interviewed to identify factors influencing the ACP implementation process.
RESULTS: Seventy-five PwPMS were eligible out of 164 screened; 56/75 (75%) refused participation and 19 were included. Of these, 11 (58% vs 30% hypothesized) completed the ACP-Doc. A total of 25 adverse events (increase in anxiety) occurred, three possibly related to the intervention, and we found a worsening of HADS-Anxiety score (p = 0.02) and MSQOL-29 mental health composite score (p = 0.04) during follow-up. PwPMS/SO interviews revealed four themes: significance of the ACP process (on the individual, on relation with clinicians), its impact (on emotions, on family relations), preparedness as key, and challenges (practicability, SO commitment). Barriers and facilitators for ACP were identified in two clinician focus groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The intervention supported neurologists in guiding PwPMS in their ACP. However, trial findings and the high proportion of refusals point to the need to enrich the intervention with a new component targeting PwPMS and SOs.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN48527663.
METHODS: Single-arm pilot/feasibility trial involving PwPMS, their significant others (SOs), and clinicians from six Italian centers. Primary study outcome was completion of an advance care plan document (ACP-Doc). Other outcomes included safety, feasibility of enrollment and assessment, and (analyzed using mixed-methods approach) Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), quality of communication, quality of life (MSQOL-29), and caregiver burden. Participants were interviewed to identify factors influencing the ACP implementation process.
RESULTS: Seventy-five PwPMS were eligible out of 164 screened; 56/75 (75%) refused participation and 19 were included. Of these, 11 (58% vs 30% hypothesized) completed the ACP-Doc. A total of 25 adverse events (increase in anxiety) occurred, three possibly related to the intervention, and we found a worsening of HADS-Anxiety score (p = 0.02) and MSQOL-29 mental health composite score (p = 0.04) during follow-up. PwPMS/SO interviews revealed four themes: significance of the ACP process (on the individual, on relation with clinicians), its impact (on emotions, on family relations), preparedness as key, and challenges (practicability, SO commitment). Barriers and facilitators for ACP were identified in two clinician focus groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The intervention supported neurologists in guiding PwPMS in their ACP. However, trial findings and the high proportion of refusals point to the need to enrich the intervention with a new component targeting PwPMS and SOs.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN48527663.