MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology · 2010

[Cartilage-perichondrium autografting for the repair articular cartilage defects of finger: a report of 11 cases].

Chen Yi-Quan, Yuan Tai-Zhen, Wang Jian, Gong Guo-Ling, Li Zuo-Ling

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To study the clinical effects of self-invented cartilage-perichondrium autografting for the repair of articular cartilage defects, so as to reconstruct the joint surface.

METHODS

Among total 11 patients with hand injuries from Oct. 2005 to Oct. 2009, 7 patients were male and 4 patients were female, ranging in age from 17 to 50 years, with an average of 29 years. All the patients had serious injuries of finger joint and were treated with cartilage-perichondrium autografting. After the operation, function exercises were performed, and composite scores of joints at hand were used to evaluate therapeutic effects.

RESULTS

All the patients were followed-up from 1 to 4 years with an average of 24 months. The operation of all the patients were successful, and there were no infection. The mean score was (41.0 +/- 0.63) in 2 years after operation. Eight patients got an excellent result (> 38 scores), 2 good (from 35 to 38 scores) and 1 bad (< 30 scores).

CONCLUSION

The cartilage-perichondrium autografting method is effective to reconstruct the defects of articular cartilage, and decrease the disablement rate of hand injuries.

Для цитирования: Chen Yi-Quan, Yuan Tai-Zhen, Wang Jian, Gong Guo-Ling, Li Zuo-Ling. [Cartilage-perichondrium autografting for the repair articular cartilage defects of finger: a report of 11 cases].. Zhongguo gu shang = China journal of orthopaedics and traumatology. 2010.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.