Bone marrow transplantation · 2025
BEAM/ATG or cyclophosphamide/ATG as conditioning regimen in autologous haemopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: a retrospective analysis of the EBMT autoimmune diseases working party.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Greco Raffaella, Saccardi Riccardo, Ponzano Marta, Badoglio Manuela, Helbig Grzegorz, Smilowski Marek, Mariottini Alice, Burman Joachim, Carlson Kristina, Kazmi Majid, Muraro Paolo A, Gabriel Ian, Withers Barbara, Massey Jennifer, Varaldo Riccardo, Inglese Matilde, Sanz Jaime, Gil-Perotin Sara, Sharrack Basil, Roldan Elisa, Nozzoli Chiara, Signori Alessio, Sormani Maria Pia, Alexander Tobias, Snowden John A
Аннотация
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is the most frequent autoimmune disease (AD) treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). There are no prospective trials comparing the most used conditioning regimens, BEAM/Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclophosphamide (CYC)/ATG. Herein, we report a retrospective analysis of the EBMT database aimed to assess their risk/benefit ratio. We included 1114 MS patients who were conditioned with either BEAM/ATG or CYC/ATG. Neutrophil engraftment in BEAM/ATG- and CYC/ATG-treated patients occurred at a median time of 11 and 10 days after HSCT (p = 0.079). Overall, 2.0% of patients conditioned with BEAM/ATG and 1.0% with CYC/ATG died within 100 days from HSCT (p = 0.19). Overall, the incidence of NEDA (No-Evidence of Disease Activity) failure in BEAM/ATG and CYC/ATG at 5 years was 42.3% (95% CI: 36.3-48.8%) and 44.1% (95% CI: 30.8-60.1%), respectively (p = 0.081). No statistically significant differences between the two treatments [HR = 0.90 (95% CI = 0.61; 1.34), p = 0.60] were confirmed, when adjusting for disease type, disability at baseline and year of transplant. A clear difference between the regimens is lacking, both in terms of toxicity and efficacy, in this large population. Type of disease (relapsing/remitting vs progressive) is still the major determinant of neurological outcome.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
HumansCyclophosphamideMultiple SclerosisHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTransplantation ConditioningRetrospective StudiesMaleFemaleAdultMiddle AgedAntilymphocyte SerumTransplantation, AutologousMelphalanEtoposideAdolescentThiotepaYoung AdultCarmustineCytarabineAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols