DOI 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2018.11.002
Contemporary epidemiology of systemic sclerosis: A population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To estimate the contemporary epidemiology of systemic sclerosis (SSc) in the UK and to explore the validity of using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) primary care database to study SSc.
METHODS
4,520,299 individuals (2000-2012) aged 1-99 years were followed to identify potential incident cases of SSc; potential prevalent cases were identified at start of follow-up. Patient profiles, including free-text comments, were manually reviewed to verify cases of SSc, and case validation was undertaken for a sample (n = 100) using questionnaires to primary care physicians. Incidence, prevalence and mortality rates were calculated.
RESULTS
Following manual review, we identified 1321 cases of SSc (689 incident and 632 prevalent) over a mean follow-up of 7.6 years; mean age at diagnosis 59.1 years. Using information from 91/100 valid questionnaires returned, the positive predictive value of SSc diagnoses in THIN following manual review was 94%. Incidence rates of SSc per 100,000 person-years (95% CI) were 2.02 (1.87-2.17) overall, [3.36 (3.09-3.64) in females, 0.61 (0.49-0.74) in males], ranging from 1.53 (1.11-2.06) to 2.56 (1.78-3.56) across calendar years. Prevalence of SSc per 100,000 (95% CI) increased from 17.13 (14.97-19.51) to 25.38 (23.68-27.16) over the study period, and was higher in females. Using Poisson regression, the adjusted mortality rate ratio was 2.82 (95% CI: 2.55-3.13) among SSc cases versus the general population.
CONCLUSIONS
THIN enables precise and valid estimates of SSc occurrence to be determined. The observed increase in SSc prevalence has not been driven by increasing incidence.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.