A multidisciplinary experimental and methodological investigation of electron and proton minibeams in the framework of the INFN MIRO project.
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Romano Francesco, Zanacchi Francesca Cella, Ciarrocchi Esther, Franciosini Gaia, Milluzzo Giuliana, Scifoni Emanuele, Vignati Anna, Ahmad Said, Arezzini Silvia, Attili Andrea, Battestini Marco, Bernardini Jacopo, Bettanin Matteo, Bisio Alessandra, Bisogni Maria Giuseppina, Bodrenko Igor, Bordieri Giulio, Bravatà Valentina, Burattini Alberto, Camarda Massimo, Cammarata Francesco Paolo, Capaccioli Simone, Castelli Lorenzo, Cavalieri Andrea, Celentano Mariagrazia, Chiadroni Enrica, Cordoni Francesco Giuseppe, Corvaia Elena, Costa Mario, Curcio Alessandro, Da Pozzo Eleonora, De Felice Martina, Debbio Francesca Del, D'Errico Francesco, D'Oca Maria Cristina, D'Orsi Beatrice, Deut Umberto, Durisi Elisabetta, Fantacci Maria Evelina, Farina Stefano, Felici Giuseppe, Ferro Arianna, Ficcadenti Luca, Formuso Antonino, Forte Giusi Irma, Giordanengo Simona, Giuliano Alessia, Giuliano Lucia, Lanzanò Luca, Linsalata Stefania, Lossano Simone, Maffei Margherita, Marafini Michela, Marrale Maurizio, Massa Maurizio, Masturzo Luigi, Mazzoni Enrico, Migliorati Mauro, Milian Felix Mas, Minafra Luigi, Moggi Andrea, Olivares Diango Montalvan, Montefiori Marco, Morrocchi Matteo, Mostacci Andrea, Mostardi Franco, Okpuwe Chinonso, Paiar Fabiola, Palumbo Luigi, Patera Vincenzo, Pensavalle Jake Harold, Pucci Gaia, Quattrini Flaminia, Retico Alessandra, Rosso Valeria, Russo Giorgio, Sacchi Roberto, Sarti Alessio, Scalisi Silvia, Scapicchio Camilla, Schiavi Angelo, Stochino Paolo, Strettoi Enrica, Tommasino Francesco, Tozzini Valentina, Traini Giacomo, Trovato Gabriele, Usai Alice, Urso Francesco, Martino Fabio Di
Аннотация
PURPOSE: The aim of this work is to report on the on-going main activities recently carried out in the framework of the project, showing some of the main results achieved during the first 2 years of the project, in terms of: (i) facilities development and characterization; (ii) new dosimetric approaches; (iii) biological investigation of the effect; and (iv) development of the first tools for dose planning. The multidisciplinary approach adopted by this national Collaboration to tackle the main challenges of minibeam radiotherapy for a reliable and solid clinical translation is discussed.
METHODS: The facilities involved in the project are: (i) two facilities dedicated to low (up to 9 MeV) and medium (up to 18 MeV) energy electron minibeam studies, one of them also equipped with an electron FLASH LINAC to study possible synergistic effects with UHDR beams; (ii) one facility dedicated to proton minibeam studies, with energies from 70 to 140 MeV. Novel dosimetric approaches, are presented, mainly based on scintillators, silicon and silicon carbide detectors. Novel techniques for the analysis of biological samples are described, leveraging both integrated averaged data and spatially resolved analysis. Furthermore, a framework for biological modeling using a multiscale approach is presented. A dedicated dose-planning tool is currently under development to compare "virtual" minibeam plans with conventional ones and, consequently, to quantitatively investigate the potential for clinical translation.
RESULTS: All the facilities were dosimetrically characterized, demonstrating the capability of producing controlled and reproducible electron and proton minibeams. These beams exhibited diverse physical parameters, including peak-to-valley ratios between 3 and 30 at the entrance and center-to-center distances between 2 and 3 mm. The developed detectors, specifically scintillators and silicon detectors, successfully measured the minibeam patterns with sub-millimeter resolution, while large-area silicon carbide detectors were used for average dose measurements. First in-vitro biological investigations performed with low energy minibeams clearly showed an enhanced survival fraction in the 16HBE healthy lung cells, while maintaining iso-effective cell killing in A549 cancer cells. Furthermore, a synergy was observed when combining UHDR electron beams with minibeams.
CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary approach was consolidated during these first 2 years of the MIRO project, as demonstrated by the results obtained both in terms of dosimetric characterization and biological investigations. The dedicated framework for modelling is being optimized to support the biological findings, allowing for a better interpretation of the results. The tool for dose planning, still under development, will allow the investigation of peculiar configurations to explore new frontiers in the perspective of future human trials.