DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.10.100
A Review of Spinal Lesions in Neurofibromatosis Type 1 in a Large Neurofibromatosis Type 1 Center.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Spinal lesions are a known manifestation of neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1). The aim of this retrospective review was to analyze and report the prevalence of spinal lesions on imaging in a large NF1 center.
METHODS
The data were collected from a period of 62 months from a cohort of 514 patients. Data were collected from multidisciplinary team meeting reports that included radiologic reports of each patient investigating 20 distinct variables. The prevalence of each of these lesions was calculated, and any statistically significant associations were investigated using the χ2 test.
RESULTS
Four-hundred forty-seven patients had classic NF1, and 67 patients had spinal NF1. Many of the patients had spinal abnormalities; 25.7% of these patients were found to have dural ectasia, whereas 44.9% of patients had a spinal deformity. A statistically significant association between dural ectasia and spinal neurofibromatosis was established (P < 0.05). An additional statically significant association was established between dural ectasia and spinal deformity (P < 0.00001). The patients with spinal nerve root tumors were identified, and it was found that 49.8% of patients possessed these tumors, whereas 56.3% of these tumors were intraspinal tumors. The most common region affected was the cervical spine, and the most common spinal level was C2.
CONCLUSIONS
This high prevalence of spinal tumours in mobile areas of the spine is possibly the result of a combination of genetic predisposition and repeated microtraumas resulting in tumor formation. This is the largest reported study of spinal lesions in NF1 based on imaging and offers insights into the etiology and relationships between lesions.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.