DOI 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110464
The prevalence of swallowing dysfunction in children with laryngomalacia: a systematic review.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
Laryngomalacia (LM) is commonly diagnosed in infants and children with upper aerodigestive symptoms. In the literature, the focus has been on the respiratory impairment, with fewer studies addressing swallowing dysfunction (SwD). The objective of this study is to systematically review the literature for evidence on the prevalence of SwD in children diagnosed with LM.
METHODS
A search was conducted on the following databases: OVID Medline, Ovid EMBASE, EBSCO CINAHL, PROSPERO, and Cochrane Library. We included all the studies that reported on children with LM and documented objective swallowing assessment using fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) or videofluoroscopic swallowing study (VFSS). Two authors independently screened all the studies, assessed the level of evidence in the included studies, and extracted data. Risk of bias assessment and pooled data analysis were performed.
RESULTS
The search yielded 512 abstracts. Four studies met the selection criteria representing 425 children. Three studies were retrospective uncontrolled case series and one was a prospective cohort study. In all studies but one, an instrumental assessment of swallowing was selectively performed in patients with clinical indicators of SwD. The pooled estimate (range) of prevalence of SwD was 49% (13.9-90.6%).
CONCLUSION
The literature suggests a high prevalence of SwD in children with LM, however the level of evidence is low and generalizability is poor. The wide range of prevalence figures suggests a significant variability in the threshold and indications to assess swallowing in children with LM.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.