MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma · 2000

[Wrist trauma: diagnostic imaging].

Cusmano F, Uccelli M, Ferrozzi F, Pedrazzini M, Armaroli S, Lombardi A, Corradi M, Pavone P

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Wrist injury is common throughout life and, although history and physical examination provide important information regarding the type of lesion, a radiological study is essential to determine a specific diagnosis. Conventional radiography plays a central role in the wrist injuries but the diffusion of more sensitive methodics offers new possibilities. Our purpose is to evaluate the role of computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) and arthrography in wrist trauma. We retrospectively examined the images of 45 patients with wrist injuries: in every patients a radiological examination in 4 standard projections was executed while in 25, 9 and 11 patients CT,MR and arthrography were performed. On the basis of our findings we think that conventional radiography is often sufficient for diagnosis of bone lesions even if CT sometimes is required to detect subtle fractures. MR has an high sensitivity not only for abnormalities of soft tissues, including interosseous ligaments and triangular fibrocartilage, but also bony abnormalities such as occult fractures and early osteonecrosis. Arthrography still remains the best procedure for evaluating lesions of triangular fibrocartilage and intercarpal ligaments especially in a preoperative phase.

Для цитирования: Cusmano F, Uccelli M, Ferrozzi F, Pedrazzini M, Armaroli S, Lombardi A, Corradi M, Pavone P. [Wrist trauma: diagnostic imaging].. Acta bio-medica de L'Ateneo parmense : organo della Societa di medicina e scienze naturali di Parma. 2000.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.