MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1682/jrrd.2003.09.0144

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of rehabilitation research and development · 2005

A validity study of phase velocity measurements in spinal cord injury.

de Bruin Eling D, Eser Prisca, Ring Marianne, Stüssi Edgar

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

We measured a cross-section of able-bodied (AB) men (n = 175) and men with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) (n = 33) residing in the community, 14 to 65 years old, to identify associations between dietary factors, physical activity, health status, and mechanical properties of long bones assessed by phase velocity measurement of flexural waves in the tibia during the second to seventh decades. This study (1) evaluated the influence of different types of osteoporosis risk factors on measured phase velocity of tibia bone as measured by Bone Stiffness Measurement Device (BSMD)-Swing in AB men and in men with long-standing SCI and (2) estimated the construct validity of phase velocity measurements by assessing the discriminatory capability of the BSMD-Swing. Linear regression analysis suggests a direct relationship between health status, tibia length, age, and phase velocity (R(2) = 23%). An analysis of variance results in significant differences in phase velocity values between AB controls and individuals with SCI with and without pathologic fracture history. Phase velocity measurements in the tibia shaft provide useful information about bone status in populations at risk for low-trauma fractures and seems well suited for assessing tibia bone status in SCI.

Для цитирования: de Bruin Eling D, Eser Prisca, Ring Marianne, Stüssi Edgar. A validity study of phase velocity measurements in spinal cord injury.. Journal of rehabilitation research and development. 2005. DOI: 10.1682/jrrd.2003.09.0144.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.