DOI 10.1177/230949900601400312
Thumb polydactyly: clinical outcome after reconstruction.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical and cosmetic outcomes of reconstruction in thumb polydactyly and prognostic value of the Wassel classification.
METHODS
Between 1993 and 2000 inclusive, out of the patients with thumb polydactyly (involving 80 thumbs) operated on, 34 patients (36 thumbs) were available for review and underwent clinical and radiological assessment. Outcomes in terms of the Tada score and complications were recorded.
RESULTS
The mean age of patients at the time of operation was 2.8 (range, 0.6-47) years. The mean follow-up period was 5 (range, 2.4-10) years. According to the Wassel classification, 12 were type-II thumb polydactyly, 3 type-III, 11 type-IV, 6 type-V, one type-VI, and 3 type-VII. There was no perioperative mortality or wound infection. More than 88% of the patients were satisfied or very satisfied with functional and cosmetic outcomes. Postoperative complications such as scar hypertrophy, pulp atrophy, joint deformity, and instability were common but minor. Ridge nail deformity after the Bilhaut Cloquet procedure was amenable to secondary corrective procedures. All types of operated thumb polydactyly achieved similar mean Tada scores (14.7- 16.6 out of 20). The Wassel classification category, age, and surgical procedures were found to have no prognostic value with regard to the Tada score and presence of complications.
CONCLUSION
Surgery on thumb polydactyly is rewarding. The Wassel classification category can be used as a guide for treatment, although it fails to predict the occurrence of postoperative complications or Tada scores. Our patients' results can serve as guidelines of expected outcomes after reconstructive procedures in different sub-types of thumb polydactyly.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.