MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · Italian journal of orthopaedics and traumatology · 1988

High tibial osteotomy in the treatment of arthritic varus knee. A medium term (small) review of 61 cases.

Rinonapoli E, Aglietti P, Mancini G B, Buzzi R

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

Sixty-one valgizing high tibial osteotomies performed according to the Insall method between 1975 and 1982 were reviewed; follow-up ranged from a minimum of 4 years to a maximum of 11, with an average of 7.5 years. The stage of preoperative osteoarthritis, evaluated according to Ahlbacks's classification, never exceeded Grade 3 (obliteration of the joint space and slight bone erosion). Preoperative varus never exceeded 10 degrees. The clinical results, evaluated on the score-form used at the Hospital for Special Surgery, were satisfactory in 48 cases (79% of the total) and unsatisfactory in 13 (21%). The success rate decreased to 65% in cases with a follow-up exceeding 10 years. There was frequently some loss of radiographic correction between the postoperative and follow-up values, but this was significant in only 9 cases where it exceeded 5 degrees. The arthritis was radiographically progressive in 22 cases, 18 of which were from the satisfactory group (excellent and good) and 4 from the unsatisfactory group (fair and poor). This positive evaluation of the results, even if they tended to deteriorate over a period of time, show that high valgizing tibial osteotomy is an effective operation, particularly when performed in knees without severe deformity.

Для цитирования: Rinonapoli E, Aglietti P, Mancini G B, Buzzi R. High tibial osteotomy in the treatment of arthritic varus knee. A medium term (small) review of 61 cases.. Italian journal of orthopaedics and traumatology. 1988.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.