DOI 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.02.117
Developments in Congenital Scoliosis and Related Research from 1992 to 2021: A Thirty-Year Bibliometric Analysis.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Many studies, mainly original articles and reviews, have been reported on congenital scoliosis (CS), but there is a lack of bibliometric analyses. This study aimed to systematically analyze the developments and focuses in CS and related research fields.
METHODS
Data were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database, and the top 100 most-cited studies were analyzed emphatically. The Web of Science Results Analysis and Citation Report was used to analyze different aspects of the literature. CiteSpace was used to analyze the cooperation network, reference co-citation, burst keywords, and burst citations.
RESULTS
The final analysis included 749 studies. CS and related research has been rapidly expanding. Several journals have published relevant studies and most-cited studies on this topic. Cooperation was noted among authors, institutions, and countries/regions in multiple instances. Surgical techniques (hemivertebra resection/posterior vertebral column resection/vertical expandable prosthetic titanium rib/double approach/grade 4 osteotomy) was one of the most common research focuses. In addition, research on genetics and molecular biology related to CS has become an emerging trend as a result of advances in basic science.
CONCLUSIONS
Over time, research on CS and in related fields has gained greater attention and has been expanding continuously, showing a trend toward globalization. We recommend that researchers focus on the progress of surgical techniques, advances in molecular biology and genetics, and characteristics of CS. The top clusters, most-cited articles, and references with the strongest burst citations should be studied further.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.