Total Elbow Arthroplasty for Distal Humerus Fractures Provided Similar Outcomes When Performed as a Primary Procedure or After Failed Internal Fixation.

OBJECTIVES

To compare clinical and functional outcomes of total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) for distal humerus fractures (DHF) performed either as a primary procedure or after internal fixation.

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN (1998 through 2016).

PATIENTS/

PARTICIPANTS

Twenty-two TEA for acute DHF and 66 TEA after previous internal fixation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Primary outcome measures included the Mayo Elbow Performance Score and motion. Reoperation rates and complications were also compared.

RESULTS

The mean time between internal fixation and arthroplasty was 7.3 years, and the main indications for conversion to TEA were nonunion (36%) and posttraumatic osteoarthritis (32%). There were female predominance (70%) and significant differences in age (74 years vs. 60 years, P < 0.0001) and tobacco use (0 vs. 23%; P = 0.02) between the primary and the salvage cohorts, respectively. Cohort demographics were otherwise comparable. TEA provided similar outcomes in both cohorts in terms of the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (acute 85, salvage 81, P = 0.32) and motion (acute 95/82/75 degrees, salvage 112/81/72 degrees in ulnohumeral/pronation/supination, P = 0.07/P = 0.85/P = 0.65). Reoperation rates were also similar (36% acute vs. 39% salvage, P = 1.00). Aseptic loosening (2 acute, 8 salvage) and deep infection (2 acute, 7 salvage) were the most common complications.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical outcomes and reoperation rates of TEA for DHF seem to be similar when performed as a primary procedure or as salvage after previous internal fixation. The benefit of avoiding elbow arthroplasty in the acute setting needs to be balanced with the potential for 2 surgical procedures if internal fixation was to be unsuccessful.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.