MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00117-019-0561-2

Медицинская библиотека · Der Radiologe · 2019

[Update: clinical imaging of cartilage-part 1 : Technical aspects].

Glaser C, Heuck A, Horng A

СтатьяОбзорПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

In order to answer clinical therapy-oriented questions, reliable and consistent depiction of articular cartilage across technical platforms is necessary.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

Technical standards and developments in cartilage imaging are summarized based on current literature and experience from clinical daily routine.

RESULTS

Clinical questions that need to be answered relate to cross-sectional extent, depth, differentiating cartilaginous from bony components of a lesion and to the lesion's location within the compartment. If present, displaced fragments, concomitant meniscal, ligamentous and/or degenerative lesions should be identified. To date, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the workhorse of cartilage imaging and is largely based on moderately T2-weighted and also proton-density (PD)-weighted fat-suppressed turbo-spin-echo sequences. Direct MR- and CT-arthrography are the gold standard to evaluate thin cartilage layers. Recent advances in coil and MR sequence design, increased availability of 3T-MR scanners and more and more sophisticated acceleration techniques allow for better spatial resolution and more robust image contrast at acceptable scan times.

DISCUSSION: As abundant as current developments in clinical routine cartilage imaging may be, the radiologist must carefully select the approach best suited to answering the clinical questions.

Для цитирования: Glaser C, Heuck A, Horng A. [Update: clinical imaging of cartilage-part 1 : Technical aspects].. Der Radiologe. 2019. DOI: 10.1007/s00117-019-0561-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.