MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1212/wnl.0000000000213912

Медицинская библиотека · Neurology · 2025

Frequency and Diagnostic Implications of Paramagnetic Rim Lesions in People Presenting for Diagnosis to a Multiple Sclerosis Clinic.

Renner Brian, Verter Elizabeth Daphne, Absinta Martina, Daboul Lynn, Raza Praneeta, Martin Melissa Lynne, Cao Quy, O'Donnell Carly M, Rodrigues Paulo R, Ramos Marc, Prchkovska Vesna, Derbyshire John, Azevedo Christina J, Bar-Or Amit, Caverzasi Eduardo, Calabresi Peter A, Cree Bruce Anthony Campbell, Freeman Leorah, Henry Roland G, Longbrake Erin E, Oh Jiwon, Papinutto Nico, Pelletier Daniel, Samudralwar Rohini D, Schindler Matthew K, Sotirchos Elias S, Sicotte Nancy L, Solomon Andrew J, Shinohara Russell T, Reich Daniel S, Ontaneda Daniel, Sati Pascal

СтатьяНаблюдательное исследованиеМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND AND

OBJECTIVES

Paramagnetic rim lesions (PRLs) are a well-established imaging biomarker of chronic active multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions. PRLs have been shown to be highly specific for MS (∼90% specificity), and their prevalence has been estimated to be approximately 50% in patients with clinically established diagnoses of MS. In this study, we evaluated the frequency and diagnostic value of PRLs in patients at first clinical presentation.

METHODS

Adults age 18-64 years presenting with clinical symptoms or radiologic suspicion of demyelinating disease referred to academic specialty MS centers without a definitive diagnosis were prospectively enrolled in a multicenter, cross-sectional, observational study. Phase images from high-resolution 3D echo-planar imaging were acquired on 3-tesla brain MRI and evaluated for PRLs by 3 independent raters, blinded to diagnosis, with adjudication from a fourth expert rater. Diagnostic performance of PRLs for a diagnosis of MS using the 2017 McDonald criteria as gold standard was evaluated using diagnostic thresholds based on the presence of at least 1 PRL (≥1 PRL) or at least 2 PRLs (≥2 PRLs).

RESULTS

Seventy-eight participants were analyzed (mean age, years [range]: 45.0 [18-64] female sex n = 55 [71%]); a total of 124 PRLs were counted in 36 (46%) of the 78 participants (median: 3 PRLs; range: 1-9 PRLs). Thirty-two (89%) of the 36 PRL-positive participants fulfilled 2017 McDonald criteria, and the remaining 4 (11%) had an alternate diagnosis. The presence of ≥1 PRL had a sensitivity of 0.86 (95% CI 0.71-0.95) and a specificity of 0.90 (95% CI 0.77-0.97). For ≥2 PRLs, specificity increased to 0.95 (95% CI 0.83-0.99), whereas sensitivity decreased to 0.59 (95% CI 0.42-0.75). For participants with MS, shorter duration from initial symptom onset was associated with higher probability of having PRLs, with the odds of being PRL positive (≥1 PRL) increasing by 28% for every 1 year decrease from symptom onset (odds ratio 1.28 per year, 95% CI 1.03-1.59, p = 0.03).

DISCUSSION: PRLs are highly prevalent early in patients with MS at the time of first clinical presentation and can differentiate MS from mimics with high accuracy.

Для цитирования: Renner Brian, Verter Elizabeth Daphne, Absinta Martina, Daboul Lynn, Raza Praneeta, Martin Melissa Lynne, Cao Quy, O'Donnell Carly M, Rodrigues Paulo R, Ramos Marc, Prchkovska Vesna, Derbyshire John, Azevedo Christina J, Bar-Or Amit, Caverzasi Eduardo, Calabresi Peter A, Cree Bruce Anthony Campbell, Freeman Leorah, Henry Roland G, Longbrake Erin E, Oh Jiwon, Papinutto Nico, Pelletier Daniel, Samudralwar Rohini D, Schindler Matthew K, Sotirchos Elias S, Sicotte Nancy L, Solomon Andrew J, Shinohara Russell T, Reich Daniel S, Ontaneda Daniel, Sati Pascal. Frequency and Diagnostic Implications of Paramagnetic Rim Lesions in People Presenting for Diagnosis to a Multiple Sclerosis Clinic.. Neurology. 2025. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.0000000000213912.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.