MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций
Медицинская библиотека · JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association · 2017

Frequency and associated risk factors for neck pain among software engineers in Karachi, Pakistan.

Rasim Ul Hasanat Mohammad, Ali Syed Shahzad, Rasheed Abdur, Khan Muhammad

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVE

To determine the frequency of neck pain and its association with risk factors among software engineers.

METHODS

This descriptive, cross-sectional study was conducted at the Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, from February to March 2016, and comprised software engineers from 19 different locations. Non-probability purposive sampling technique was used to select individuals spending at least 6 hours in front of computer screens every day and having a work experience of at least 6 months. Data were collected using a self-administrable questionnaire. SPSS 21 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 185 participants, 49(26.5%) had neck pain at the time of data-gathering, while 136(73.5%) reported no pain. However, 119(64.32%) participants had a previous history of neck pain. Other factors like smoking, physical inactivity, history of any muscular pain and neck pain, uncomfortable workstation, and work-related mental stress and insufficient sleep at night, were found to be significantly associated with current neck pain (p<0.05 each).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensive computer users are likely to experience at least one episode of computer-associated neck pain.

Для цитирования: Rasim Ul Hasanat Mohammad, Ali Syed Shahzad, Rasheed Abdur, Khan Muhammad. Frequency and associated risk factors for neck pain among software engineers in Karachi, Pakistan.. JPMA. The Journal of the Pakistan Medical Association. 2017.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.