DOI 10.1007/s41999-024-01037-3
Doctor and patient perceptions of sarcopenia in community-based primary care clinics: a questionnaire survey.
Аннотация
PURPOSE: Our study aims to examine perceptions of sarcopenia among doctors and patients for improved management strategies in the future.
METHODS
We analyzed nine matched items from separate surveys involving 80 community-based primary care doctors, recruited online (55%) and offline (45%), and 80 community-dwelling older patients who visited 6 of the 80 primary care clinics in South Korea.
RESULTS
Doctors had a mean age of 58.3 ± 9.1 years, with 17.5% women; patients had a mean age of 74.1 ± 6.1 years, with 61.3% women. Twenty-eight patients (35.4%) had heard of sarcopenia, while only 19 doctors (23.8%) knew the diagnostic criteria of sarcopenia. Patients were more likely to believe they had sarcopenia than doctors assumed their patients had sarcopenia (patients, 35%; doctors, 16.9%; P = 0.0039). Patients desired more exercise and nutritional education than doctors reported they could provide (all P < 0.01). More patients preferred regular text messages for exercise or nutritional education (for exercise: patients 16.5%, doctors 5.8%, P = 0.0428; for nutrition: patients 17.1%, doctors 4.4%, P = 0.0154). Many patients were unaware of available community services for sarcopenia management (patients 48.8%, doctors 10.0%, P < 0.001).
CONCLUSION
Both patients and doctors in community-based primary care clinics lacked awareness of sarcopenia. Significant discrepancies existed between the exercise and nutritional education patients desired and what doctors could provide. These findings can inform the development of sarcopenia management programs in primary care clinics.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.