MedElevator
Войти в исследования Spine · 2005
Closing wedge osteotomy versus opening wedge osteotomy in ankylosing spondylitis with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Chang Kao-Wha, Chen Ying-Yu, Lin Chien-Chung, Hsu Hsiang-Lan, Pai Ke-Chun
Аннотация
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective.
OBJECTIVES: To compare lumbar posterior opening wedge osteotomy (OWO) and closing wedge osteotomy (CWO) in patients with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity attributable to ankylosing spondylitis.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: OWO and CWO have been used to correct ankylosing spondylitis-related kyphotic deformity, but the ideal surgical procedure remains controversial.
METHODS: Sixty-six patients underwent OWO, and 51 underwent CWO (102 male, 15 female; mean age, 34.8 years; age range, 17-55 years). Radiographic results, complications, and patient satisfaction were analyzed over a mean follow-up of 3.6 years (range, 2.1-5.3 years)
RESULTS: For OWO and CWO, mean operative times were 183 and 218 minutes, and mean blood losses were 1101 and 1915 mL, respectively. Lumbar lordosis increased by 37 degrees with OWO versus 36 degrees with CWO group, as shown on final radiographs. Sagittal imbalance improved 80 and 77 mm with OWO and CWO, respectively. Complications included delayed union in three patients and a broken rod at the osteotomy site in the OWO group. Six transient neurologic deficits occurred overall. No mortality or major complications occurred. Five patients developed junctional kyphosis (two undergoing OWO, three undergoing CWO), and all required repeat operation. Satisfactory clinical outcomes were achieved in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Both OWO and CWO were safe and enabled substantial correction, with good clinical results. CWO resulted in a significantly longer operative time and more bleeding but offered fewer instances of paralytic ileus or delayed union with a broken rod.
OBJECTIVES: To compare lumbar posterior opening wedge osteotomy (OWO) and closing wedge osteotomy (CWO) in patients with thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity attributable to ankylosing spondylitis.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: OWO and CWO have been used to correct ankylosing spondylitis-related kyphotic deformity, but the ideal surgical procedure remains controversial.
METHODS: Sixty-six patients underwent OWO, and 51 underwent CWO (102 male, 15 female; mean age, 34.8 years; age range, 17-55 years). Radiographic results, complications, and patient satisfaction were analyzed over a mean follow-up of 3.6 years (range, 2.1-5.3 years)
RESULTS: For OWO and CWO, mean operative times were 183 and 218 minutes, and mean blood losses were 1101 and 1915 mL, respectively. Lumbar lordosis increased by 37 degrees with OWO versus 36 degrees with CWO group, as shown on final radiographs. Sagittal imbalance improved 80 and 77 mm with OWO and CWO, respectively. Complications included delayed union in three patients and a broken rod at the osteotomy site in the OWO group. Six transient neurologic deficits occurred overall. No mortality or major complications occurred. Five patients developed junctional kyphosis (two undergoing OWO, three undergoing CWO), and all required repeat operation. Satisfactory clinical outcomes were achieved in both groups.
CONCLUSION: Both OWO and CWO were safe and enabled substantial correction, with good clinical results. CWO resulted in a significantly longer operative time and more bleeding but offered fewer instances of paralytic ileus or delayed union with a broken rod.