Evaluation of shoulder balance in early onset scoliosis after definitive fusion and comparison with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis shoulder balance.

STUDY

DESIGN

The Children Spine Study Group registry was queried for early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients who had final definitive spinal fusion after their scoliosis was managed with either growing rods or VEPTR. The Harms Study Group registry was queried for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients who had definitive fusion

OBJECTIVE

The goal is to assess shoulder alignment in EOS patients after a definitive fusion and how these radiographic outcomes relate to the more familiar situation of post-definitive fusions shoulder alignment in AIS patients.

BACKGROUND

EOS is a challenging pathology to manage. Numerous components are important in the success of spinal surgery for this population. Shoulder balance is a one of the components that is easily seen by the patient. Recently, the importance of its relationship to patient satisfaction has received greater attention.

METHODS

Sample size: n = 145 (EOS (n = 34) and AIS (n = 111)). Shoulder balance parameters (SBP) of clavicular angle (CA), coracoid height difference (CHD), clavicular tilt angle difference (CTAD), and clavicle-rib cage intersection difference (CRID) measurements were measured from the reviewed radiographs and documented pre-definitive, post-definitive and 2-year follow-up measures. Shoulder balance parameters were compared between EOS and AIS cohorts at documented intervals.

RESULTS

EOS mean pre-definitive fusion SBPs (CA, CTAD, CRID, CHD) were significantly higher compared to AIS, p = 0.004, 0.003, < 0.001, < 0.001, respectively. Significant post-definitive fusion corrections were noticed for CTAD (0.01), CHD (0.01), nearly significant CA (0.07), non-significant CRID in EOS patients. In AIS patients, no significant corrections were noticed for CA, CTAD, CHD and but significant for CRID (0.02). At post-definitive and 2-year follow-up, CA, CRID, CHD were not significant between cohorts, but CTAD (< 0.01) was significantly higher in EOS cohort at final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Post-definitive and 2-year follow-up shoulder balance for EOS patients was not significantly different from AIS patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.