MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.62641/aep.v52i4.1679

Медицинская библиотека · Actas espanolas de psiquiatria · 2024

Causality between Sarcopenia and Depression: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.

Li Yongzhi, Han Lijun, Liang Jingliang, Song Rui, Tai Miao, Sun Xiaojie

СтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Numerous observational studies have suggested a correlation between sarcopenia and depression, but the nature of this relationship requires further investigation.

METHODS

This study employed bidirectional Mendelian randomization to explore this connection. Data from genome-wide association studies were used, encompassing measures of sarcopenia and mental factors, including depression and emotional states. The initial analysis concentrated on the impact of depression on sarcopenia, and then it examined the reverse relationship. The same methodology was applied to emotional data for validation.

RESULTS

The results indicated a reciprocal causation between sarcopenia and depression, even when emotional state data were considered. Various emotions can impact sarcopenia, and in turn, sarcopenia can affect emotions, except subjective well-being. These findings highlight a cyclic deterioration between sarcopenia and depression, with a link to negative emotions and a partially ameliorative effect of subjective well-being on sarcopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, this study sheds light on the interplay between psychiatric factors and sarcopenia, offering insights into intervention and prevention strategies.

Для цитирования: Li Yongzhi, Han Lijun, Liang Jingliang, Song Rui, Tai Miao, Sun Xiaojie. Causality between Sarcopenia and Depression: A Bidirectional Mendelian Randomization Study.. Actas espanolas de psiquiatria. 2024. DOI: 10.62641/aep.v52i4.1679.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.