Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine · 2023
Exploration of the Golf-Specific Low Back Pain Questionnaire.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Skibski Andrew, Goetschius John, Mangum L Colby
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to determine internal consistency and concurrent validity of the Golf-specific Low Back Pain questionnaire (GLBP).
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Online questionnaire.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two adult golfers with a history of LBP.
INTERVENTIONS: GLBP, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cronbach alpha values for the GLBP and its 3 subscales. Pearson correlations between the ODI, GLBP, and the GLBP subscales.
RESULTS: Cronbach alpha for the GLBP was 0.94. Cronbach alpha for the 3 GLBP subscales ranged from 0.85 to 0.91. All Pearson correlations were significant at P < 0.05. The correlation between the ODI and GLBP was -0.64, and correlations between the ODI and GLBP subscales ranged from -0.53 to -0.63. Mean GLBP score was 72.01% ± 16.15%, and mean ODI score was 12.00% ± 7.98%.
CONCLUSIONS: The GLBP has excellent concurrent validity to quantify LBP in golfers. The GLBP total and each individual subscale have excellent internal consistency and a moderate inverse relationship with the ODI. The GLBP offers a more sport-specific patient-reported outcome measure for this population. The GLBP may more adequately quantify LBP-related disability, especially at lower levels of disability. Findings provide initial evidence that the GLBP may be a valid tool to quantify LBP symptoms and dysfunction in golfers.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should consider using sport-specific outcome measures when evaluating for LBP-related disability.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.
SETTING: Online questionnaire.
PARTICIPANTS: Fifty-two adult golfers with a history of LBP.
INTERVENTIONS: GLBP, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI).
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cronbach alpha values for the GLBP and its 3 subscales. Pearson correlations between the ODI, GLBP, and the GLBP subscales.
RESULTS: Cronbach alpha for the GLBP was 0.94. Cronbach alpha for the 3 GLBP subscales ranged from 0.85 to 0.91. All Pearson correlations were significant at P < 0.05. The correlation between the ODI and GLBP was -0.64, and correlations between the ODI and GLBP subscales ranged from -0.53 to -0.63. Mean GLBP score was 72.01% ± 16.15%, and mean ODI score was 12.00% ± 7.98%.
CONCLUSIONS: The GLBP has excellent concurrent validity to quantify LBP in golfers. The GLBP total and each individual subscale have excellent internal consistency and a moderate inverse relationship with the ODI. The GLBP offers a more sport-specific patient-reported outcome measure for this population. The GLBP may more adequately quantify LBP-related disability, especially at lower levels of disability. Findings provide initial evidence that the GLBP may be a valid tool to quantify LBP symptoms and dysfunction in golfers.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Clinicians should consider using sport-specific outcome measures when evaluating for LBP-related disability.