International orthopaedics · 2021
Cannulated screw fixation versus plate fixation in treating displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Wang Qiuyuan, Zhang Nianfei, Guo Wanshou, Wang Weiguo, Zhang Qidong
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Operative treatment has become the current trend for displaced intra-articular calcaneus fracture (DIACF), while using cannulated screw fixation or plate fixation is still controversial for treating DIACF. The purpose of this meta-analysis is to compare the outcome of the two fixation methods.
METHODS: We searched literature comparing cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The outcomes of post-operative function, radiological measurement, time efficiency, and wound complications were pooled in the meta-analysis.
RESULT: Seven RCTs with 902 cases of DIACF were included. Pooled results showed the two fixation methods that had similar function satisfactory of AOFAS score (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = [0.83, 1.09], P = 0.47, I2 = 0%) and Maryland Foot score (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = [0.68, 1.28], P = 0.66, I2 = 84%). Compared to plate fixation, cannulated screw fixation had better improvement of Bohler's angle (WMD = 0.56, 95% CI = [0.20, 0.91], P = 0.002, I2 = 34%) and Gissane's angle (WMD = 1.36, 95% CI = [0.56, 2.16], P = 0.0008, I2 = 7%), better recovery of calcaneal height (WMD = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.95], P = 0.04, I2 = 6%), shorter time to operation (WMD = - 2.91, 95% CI = [- 4.99, - 0.84], P = 0.006, I2 = 97%), less operation time (WMD = - 21.58, 95% CI = [- 37.31, - 5.85], P = 0.007, I2 = 98%), reduced length of hospital stay (WMD = - 2.00, 95% CI = [- 3.69, - 0.31], P = 0.02, I2 = 97%), and less wound complications (RR = 0.16, 95% CI = [0.08, 0.32], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%).
CONCLUSION: Cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation have similar postoperative functional satisfactory. Cannulated screw fixation is superior to plate fixation in reduction quality, time efficiency, and wound complications.
METHODS: We searched literature comparing cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation from PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The outcomes of post-operative function, radiological measurement, time efficiency, and wound complications were pooled in the meta-analysis.
RESULT: Seven RCTs with 902 cases of DIACF were included. Pooled results showed the two fixation methods that had similar function satisfactory of AOFAS score (RR = 0.95, 95% CI = [0.83, 1.09], P = 0.47, I2 = 0%) and Maryland Foot score (RR = 0.93, 95% CI = [0.68, 1.28], P = 0.66, I2 = 84%). Compared to plate fixation, cannulated screw fixation had better improvement of Bohler's angle (WMD = 0.56, 95% CI = [0.20, 0.91], P = 0.002, I2 = 34%) and Gissane's angle (WMD = 1.36, 95% CI = [0.56, 2.16], P = 0.0008, I2 = 7%), better recovery of calcaneal height (WMD = 0.49, 95% CI = [0.02, 0.95], P = 0.04, I2 = 6%), shorter time to operation (WMD = - 2.91, 95% CI = [- 4.99, - 0.84], P = 0.006, I2 = 97%), less operation time (WMD = - 21.58, 95% CI = [- 37.31, - 5.85], P = 0.007, I2 = 98%), reduced length of hospital stay (WMD = - 2.00, 95% CI = [- 3.69, - 0.31], P = 0.02, I2 = 97%), and less wound complications (RR = 0.16, 95% CI = [0.08, 0.32], P < 0.00001, I2 = 0%).
CONCLUSION: Cannulated screw fixation and plate fixation have similar postoperative functional satisfactory. Cannulated screw fixation is superior to plate fixation in reduction quality, time efficiency, and wound complications.