Annals of vascular surgery · 2013
Sarcomas of the aorta: a systematic review and pooled analysis of published reports.
СтатьяСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Rusthoven Chad G, Liu Arthur K, Bui Marilyn M, Schefter Tracey E, Elias Anthony D, Lu Xian, Gonzalez Ricardo J
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Aortic sarcomas are rare and aggressive tumors with a propensity for arterial embolization, disseminated metastases, and rapid clinical deterioration. Overall, little is known about the evaluation and management of this disease.
METHODS: A systematic review and pooled analysis were performed from a comprehensive search of the MEDLINE database for reports of primary aortic sarcomas published in the English language.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five cases were analyzed. The median age was 60 years, and the male:female ratio was 1.5:1. High tumor grade (87.3%), arterial embolization (46.7%), and metastatic disease at diagnosis (44.8%) were common. Typical histologies were undifferentiated (39.4%), angiosarcomatous (37%), leiomyosarcomatous (13.3%), and fibroblastic (7.3%). Management was diverse and included combinations of surgical resection (46.7%), palliative vascular surgeries (37.7%), chemotherapy (28.7%), and radiotherapy (14.7%). The median survival was 11 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 46.7%, 17.1%, and 8.8%, respectively. On univariate analyses, metastatic disease at diagnoses, surgical resection, and chemotherapy were associated with survival. On multivariate analysis, only metastatic disease remained significant (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic tumors are devastating malignancies with distinct clinical features from sarcomas at other sites. Although prognosis is poor overall, long-term survivors have been reported, and aggressive management with surgical resection and adjuvant therapy should be considered in medically suitable patients. High embolic rates suggest a potential role for prophylactic anticoagulation.
METHODS: A systematic review and pooled analysis were performed from a comprehensive search of the MEDLINE database for reports of primary aortic sarcomas published in the English language.
RESULTS: One hundred sixty-five cases were analyzed. The median age was 60 years, and the male:female ratio was 1.5:1. High tumor grade (87.3%), arterial embolization (46.7%), and metastatic disease at diagnosis (44.8%) were common. Typical histologies were undifferentiated (39.4%), angiosarcomatous (37%), leiomyosarcomatous (13.3%), and fibroblastic (7.3%). Management was diverse and included combinations of surgical resection (46.7%), palliative vascular surgeries (37.7%), chemotherapy (28.7%), and radiotherapy (14.7%). The median survival was 11 months, and the 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival rates were 46.7%, 17.1%, and 8.8%, respectively. On univariate analyses, metastatic disease at diagnoses, surgical resection, and chemotherapy were associated with survival. On multivariate analysis, only metastatic disease remained significant (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Aortic tumors are devastating malignancies with distinct clinical features from sarcomas at other sites. Although prognosis is poor overall, long-term survivors have been reported, and aggressive management with surgical resection and adjuvant therapy should be considered in medically suitable patients. High embolic rates suggest a potential role for prophylactic anticoagulation.