The Journal of craniofacial surgery · 2020
Open Versus Closing Wedge Osteotomy and Application to Mandibular Reconstruction.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Hu Shirley, Klimczak Jaclyn, Garner Weylon, Hart Hannah, Kadakia Sameep P, Wood-Smith Donald, Abraham Manoj T
Аннотация
PURPOSE: To review the specific techniques of closing wedge osteotomy and open osteotomy, compare their clinical and radiographic outcomes, and apply these findings to mandibular reconstruction.
METHODS: A thorough review of the otolaryngology, facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and orthopedic surgery literature was conducted in the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases using the terms 'osteotomy' and 'mandibular reconstruction.'
RESULTS: Traditionally, open osteotomies were thought to result in greater rates of malunion. However, multiple meta-analyses within the orthopedic literature have refuted this. Closing wedge osteotomies, on the other hand, may increase the chance of damaging a perforator. Again, no studies have evaluated the relationship between type of osteotomy and flap survival or wound healing. The particular type of osteotomy performed often depends on the type of osseous flap being utilized.
CONCLUSIONS: Open osteotomies are a viable and even preferred alternative, particularly in flaps without consistent perforators, such as scapular free flaps.
METHODS: A thorough review of the otolaryngology, facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, oral and maxillofacial surgery, and orthopedic surgery literature was conducted in the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases using the terms 'osteotomy' and 'mandibular reconstruction.'
RESULTS: Traditionally, open osteotomies were thought to result in greater rates of malunion. However, multiple meta-analyses within the orthopedic literature have refuted this. Closing wedge osteotomies, on the other hand, may increase the chance of damaging a perforator. Again, no studies have evaluated the relationship between type of osteotomy and flap survival or wound healing. The particular type of osteotomy performed often depends on the type of osseous flap being utilized.
CONCLUSIONS: Open osteotomies are a viable and even preferred alternative, particularly in flaps without consistent perforators, such as scapular free flaps.