MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1590/s0104-42302005000500022

Медицинская библиотека · Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2005

[Epidemiology of facial trauma].

Wulkan Marcelo, Parreira José Gustavo, Botter Denise Aparecida

Аннотация на английскомСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to determine the incidence, etiology, severity of facial trauma and associated injuries enabling a greater understanding of its range and magnitude

METHODS

A hundred and sixty four patients were selected with some degree of facial trauma regardless of gender, age and skin color. Data were analyzed by the Pearson chi2 statistical method.

RESULTS

A male predominance was observed (78%) and its peak age was between 20 and 39 years. The major cause was interpersonal violence (48.1%), followed by fall (26.2%), run overs 6.4%), sports (5.4%), car accidents (4.2%), motorcycle accidents (3.1%), non-fall impacts (2.4%), occupational injuries (1.8%), gunshot wounds (1.2%), unspecific (1.2%). Contusion is the most common injury (23.8%), followed by fractures of the mandible (21.9%), Le Fort/pan facial/complex (17.8%), nasal bones (11.6%), zygoma (10.3%), tooth (9.1%), orbit (4.9%) and maxilla (0.6%). Associated injuries occurred mostly in run overs, but also because of car accident, fall and interpersonal violence.

CONCLUSIONS

The causes of facial trauma are directly related to the age and type of lesion. No evidence was found that the causes were related to gender or severity of the lesion.

Для цитирования: Wulkan Marcelo, Parreira José Gustavo, Botter Denise Aparecida. [Epidemiology of facial trauma].. Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992). 2005. DOI: 10.1590/s0104-42302005000500022.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.