The British journal of ophthalmology · 2011
Long-term surgical outcomes of porous polyethylene orbital implants: a review of 314 cases.
Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Jung Su-Kyung, Cho Won-Kyung, Paik Ji-Sun, Yang Suk-Woo
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study reports on the long-term surgical outcomes after the insertion of porous Medpor orbital implants into anophthalmic sockets.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 314 eyes from 314 patients who underwent evisceration, enucleation and secondary procedures using Medpor orbital implants was completed focusing on implant-associated complications and their corrective methods as surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 50 months (range 6-107 months). The most common complication was blepharoptosis (n=33, 10.5%). Other postoperative complications were exposure (n=14, 4.5%) and implant infection (n=3, 1%). The complications were successfully managed by surgical repair and/or conservative care.
CONCLUSION: Using Medpor resulted in similar surgical outcomes, in terms of the types and frequencies of complications, as other kinds of porous orbital implants.
METHODS: A retrospective chart review of 314 eyes from 314 patients who underwent evisceration, enucleation and secondary procedures using Medpor orbital implants was completed focusing on implant-associated complications and their corrective methods as surgical outcomes.
RESULTS: The mean follow-up was 50 months (range 6-107 months). The most common complication was blepharoptosis (n=33, 10.5%). Other postoperative complications were exposure (n=14, 4.5%) and implant infection (n=3, 1%). The complications were successfully managed by surgical repair and/or conservative care.
CONCLUSION: Using Medpor resulted in similar surgical outcomes, in terms of the types and frequencies of complications, as other kinds of porous orbital implants.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiocompatible MaterialsChildChild, PreschoolEye EnucleationEye EviscerationEye InjuriesEye NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedOrbital ImplantsPolyethylenePorosityPostoperative PeriodProsthesis DesignProsthesis FailureRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult