MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00251-2

Медицинская библиотека · Surgical neurology · 2000

Metastatic testicular cancer presenting as spinal cord compression: report of two cases.

Arnold P M, Morgan C J, Morantz R A, Eckard D A, Kepes J J

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод в очереди

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Testicular cancers are heterogenous neoplasms often found in young adults. They tend to metastasize to the chest, retroperitoneum, or neck, but rarely to the long bones or skeleton. However, they can cause neurologic compromise and should be considered in young male patients who present with symptoms of a spine lesion and no known primary cancer.

METHODS

Two patients presented with back pain and a rapid progression of lower extremity weakness. Both underwent radiographic workup and emergency surgery. Metastatic workup revealed testicular cancer and widespread metastases.

RESULTS

Both patients improved neurologically after surgery, but neither regained the ability to ambulate independently. They both underwent chemotherapy. One patient is alive at 1 year follow-up; the other died 9 months after surgery of widespread metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Vertebral metastases from testicular tumors, although rare, should be considered in young men presenting with spinal cord compression. Work-up should include magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the spine and computed tomography (CT) of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis. Urgent intervention may be required, as these two cases show that loss of neurologic function can be rapid and permanent.

Для цитирования: Arnold P M, Morgan C J, Morantz R A, Eckard D A, Kepes J J. Metastatic testicular cancer presenting as spinal cord compression: report of two cases.. Surgical neurology. 2000. DOI: 10.1016/s0090-3019(00)00251-2.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.