Journal of pediatric surgery · 2024
Discrepancies Between Imaging Reports and Operative Findings in Patients With Cloaca: A Call for Expansion of the Mullerian Anomalies Classification.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ochoa Brielle, Weidler Erica M, van Leeuwen Kathleen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: There is wide variation in the language used to describe Mullerian structures. To standardize terminology, the American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) created the Mullerian Anomalies Classification (MAC) in 2021. The objective of this study was to evaluate the applicability of the MAC nomenclature to pediatric patients with cloaca.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with cloaca was performed at a single institution. Descriptions of Mullerian structures were evaluated and compared to the ASRM MAC categories. Descriptive statistics were used to report findings.
RESULTS: 36 patients with cloaca were identified, 13 (36%) of whom had congenital Mullerian structures that could not be adequately described by the MAC terminology. All 13 patients had two hemiuteri that were not connected in the midline and were not accurately described as uterus didelphys. Additionally, 5 of these 13 patients had reproductive anatomy that was connected by a fistula or ectopic connection to other pelvic structures.
CONCLUSION: Despite the ASRM expansion of the Mullerian anomalies nomenclature, more than a third of our patients with cloaca could not have their Mullerian structures accurately described. Describing anatomy with accurate and consistent language can improve communication between healthcare providers and may allow patients and families to better anticipate fertility options.
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients with cloaca was performed at a single institution. Descriptions of Mullerian structures were evaluated and compared to the ASRM MAC categories. Descriptive statistics were used to report findings.
RESULTS: 36 patients with cloaca were identified, 13 (36%) of whom had congenital Mullerian structures that could not be adequately described by the MAC terminology. All 13 patients had two hemiuteri that were not connected in the midline and were not accurately described as uterus didelphys. Additionally, 5 of these 13 patients had reproductive anatomy that was connected by a fistula or ectopic connection to other pelvic structures.
CONCLUSION: Despite the ASRM expansion of the Mullerian anomalies nomenclature, more than a third of our patients with cloaca could not have their Mullerian structures accurately described. Describing anatomy with accurate and consistent language can improve communication between healthcare providers and may allow patients and families to better anticipate fertility options.
STUDY TYPE: Retrospective.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.